1.Convert the binary number 11010 to octal.
2.What is the relationship between a byte and a gigabyte?
3.Arrange these storage devices in order of typical capacity: RAM, Hard Disk, USB Drive.
4.What is ASCII, and what is one limitation of it?
5.How does Unicode improve over earlier coding systems like EBCDIC?
Ruwan Suraweera Changed status to publish
1.
Answer: 11010 in octal is 32.
Description: Group binary digits into sets of 3 from right: 011 010. Convert each: 011 = 3, 010 = 2. Result is 32.
Description: Group binary digits into sets of 3 from right: 011 010. Convert each: 011 = 3, 010 = 2. Result is 32.
2.
Answer: A byte is 8 bits, and a gigabyte is 1,073,741,824 bytes (2³⁰ bytes).
Description: Data storage units increase exponentially: 1 KB = 1024 bytes, 1 MB = 1024 KB, 1 GB = 1024 MB. A gigabyte holds vastly more data than a single byte.
Description: Data storage units increase exponentially: 1 KB = 1024 bytes, 1 MB = 1024 KB, 1 GB = 1024 MB. A gigabyte holds vastly more data than a single byte.
3.
Answer: Hard Disk > USB Drive > RAM.
Description: Hard disks typically store terabytes, USB drives store gigabytes, and RAM is smaller (gigabytes) as it’s temporary storage.
Description: Hard disks typically store terabytes, USB drives store gigabytes, and RAM is smaller (gigabytes) as it’s temporary storage.
4.
Answer: ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange) is a coding system using 7 or 8 bits to represent characters. A limitation is it only supports 128 (7-bit) or 256 (8-bit) characters, excluding many global alphabets.
Description: ASCII assigns numbers to letters, digits, and symbols (e.g., ‘A’ = 65), but it’s insufficient for languages like Chinese or Arabic.
Description: ASCII assigns numbers to letters, digits, and symbols (e.g., ‘A’ = 65), but it’s insufficient for languages like Chinese or Arabic.
5.
Answer: Unicode uses up to 32 bits and supports over 1 million characters, covering all global scripts, unlike EBCDIC’s 8-bit, 256-character limit.
Description: EBCDIC was IBM-specific and limited, while Unicode’s flexibility makes it the modern standard for text encoding.
Description: EBCDIC was IBM-specific and limited, while Unicode’s flexibility makes it the modern standard for text encoding.
Ruwan Suraweera Changed status to publish